Search & Filter

A Canyon County judge rejected a request to halt TV ads promoting Idaho's Proposition 1, which seeks to restore abortion rights, ruling the ads did not violate state campaign finance laws. The lawsuit claimed Idahoans United for Women and Families funneled money through the Idaho Democratic Party to conceal the true source of funding, but the judge found insufficient evidence to support this claim.

Opponents of Idaho's Proposition 1, including the Idaho Family Policy Center and Too Extreme for Idaho PAC, filed a lawsuit seeking to stop TV ads paid for by the Idaho Democratic Party that support the abortion rights initiative. The lawsuit alleges the ads were run at lower candidate rates through coordination with the Idaho Democratic Party, violating Idaho campaign finance laws, while the Idaho Secretary of State's Office has not found any violations or received complaints about the ads.

Chrissy Teigen will campaign in Boise in support of Idaho's Proposition 1, which seeks to repeal the state's strict abortion ban and protect access to abortion, birth control, and fertility treatments. She will meet privately with Idaho mothers affected by the abortion laws and speak at a public rally at Treefort Music Hall to encourage voting in favor of Prop 1 in the November 3 election.

The PAC opposing Idaho's Proposition 1 abortion rights initiative, Too Extreme for Idaho, raised nearly $1.5 million in under two weeks, including large donations from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise. Meanwhile, the supporting PAC, Idahoans United for Women and Families, raised over $630,000 in the same period, with total independent expenditures for and against the measure exceeding $2.5 million.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints donated $1 million to the Too Extreme for Idaho PAC to oppose Idaho's abortion rights initiative, Proposition 1, on the November ballot. Other Idaho faith-based groups, including the Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise and progressive churches, have also contributed to campaigns for and against Prop 1, reflecting diverse religious perspectives on the measure within the state.

This year, Idaho voters have a lot to decide on: Who will be the state’s next governor or U.S. senator? Should two constitutional amendments pass? Should voters pass their own law to repeal the state’s abortion ban? But in the mix is a poll that the Idaho Legislature called for: What should be the state’s […]

Supporters and opponents of Idaho’s abortion rights initiative, Prop 1, have raised millions of dollars in campaign funds. The fundraising efforts highlight the significant financial involvement on both sides of the abortion rights debate in Idaho.

A panel of federal appeals judges will soon decide whether to continue to allow full enforcement of Idaho’s abortion bans, or to allow a lower court’s previous ruling that provided more exemptions to the law. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judges Kim McLane Wardlaw, Marsha Berzon and Consuelo Callahan heard oral arguments […]

With less than two months before the 2026 midterm elections, election officials across Idaho mailed the first round of mail-in ballots to voters who are overseas or who requested absentee ballots locally. The finalization of ballots in Idaho follows after a weekslong crunch to change contested language for an abortion legalization ballot initiative and attempts […]

The Idaho Supreme Court approved revised ballot language for Prop 1, an initiative that would repeal Idaho's abortion ban and establish reproductive rights including abortion up to fetal viability. One justice dissented, and supporters of the initiative objected to the language for omitting felony penalties under current Idaho abortion laws; Idaho voters will decide on Prop 1 in the November 3 general election.

A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel has temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that would have allowed an Idaho doctor to perform abortions in cases of serious health risks or self-harm, reinstating Idaho's strict abortion ban with limited exemptions. The ruling affects Dr. Stacy Seyb, who challenged the ban, and the case will be heard by the Ninth Circuit on September 22, while the Idaho Family Policy Center filed a brief supporting the state's abortion law on behalf of 54 Idaho legislators.

Idaho federal judge B. Lynn Winmill narrowed a ruling allowing abortions to protect a mother's physical or mental health to only apply to Boise doctor Stacy Seyb, who filed the lawsuit challenging the state's near-total abortion ban. Other Idaho doctors remain subject to the ban, which permits abortion only to prevent the mother's death but excludes exceptions for self-harm, while Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador has appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

An Idaho federal judge ruled that abortions may be performed if necessary to protect a woman's health or prevent self-harm, blocking enforcement of the state's criminal abortion ban in these cases. The ruling allows doctors to provide abortions for serious medical conditions without fear of criminal prosecution, though civil lawsuits under Idaho's Heartbeat law remain possible and the state plans to appeal the decision.

The Idaho Family Policy Center and some state legislators cite Idaho Board of Medicine data showing an increase in active OB-GYN licenses since the state's abortion ban took effect, challenging a 2025 JAMA study that found a 35% loss of practicing OB-GYNs in Idaho. However, state officials and doctors note that active licenses do not reliably indicate the number of OB-GYNs actively practicing maternal healthcare in Idaho, with factors such as license renewal timing and self-reported specialties complicating accurate counts.

Idaho state election officials are inviting the public to submit arguments for and against Prop 1, a ballot initiative aiming to end the state's strict abortion ban, with submissions due by July 31 for inclusion in the voter pamphlet mailed before the November 3 election. The voter pamphlet will also cover two proposed constitutional amendments regarding legislative control over drug legalization and declaring English as the official state language, as well as an advisory question on designating a state gun for Idaho.

Three women who sought abortions in Idaho due to fatal fetal diagnoses and later challenged the state's abortion ban are demanding that the anti-abortion website Live Action retract statements they say are false and defamatory. Their attorneys from Amplify Legal claim Live Action misrepresented their medical situations and motives, causing harm including death threats, and have threatened further legal action if the website does not comply.

Idaho gubernatorial candidates Terri Pickens and John Stegner support the Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act ballot initiative that would end Idaho's abortion ban if approved by voters in November. Both candidates pledged to oppose any legislative effort to repeal the initiative, while a Constitution Party candidate named Pro-Life vowed to work with the legislature to block it if passed.

A ballot initiative to end Idaho's strict abortion ban and protect access to contraceptives and IVF has qualified for the November general election after collecting over 110,000 signatures from all 44 counties. The initiative would legalize abortion until fetal viability or in emergencies and faces opposition from Idaho GOP leaders who have pledged to repeal it if passed.

Supporters of a ballot initiative to end Idaho's strict abortion ban submitted nearly 110,000 signatures to the state Capitol, aiming to qualify the measure for the November 2026 ballot. The initiative would legalize abortion until fetal viability or in emergencies and enshrine reproductive health and privacy rights, challenging Idaho's current law that imposes felony penalties on providers and has narrow exceptions.

An Idaho federal judge will decide whether abortions can be allowed in cases where a pregnant woman's health is threatened but not fatal, as challenged in a lawsuit by Boise doctor Stacy Seyb seeking expanded medical exemptions to the state's abortion ban. Expert testimony during the trial highlighted disagreements over Idaho's abortion laws, with state experts defending current restrictions and opposing experts citing cases where the laws prevent necessary care to avoid permanent health declines.

Federal trial began in Boise for Dr. Stacy Seyb, an Idaho maternal fetal medicine specialist, who is suing for medical exemptions to Idaho's near-total abortion ban that currently only allows abortions to prevent the mother's death, not to protect her health. Seyb testified that since the ban, he has had to refer patients with serious pregnancy complications to out-of-state providers, highlighting the ambiguity and strictness of Idaho's abortion laws and their impact on medical care within the state.

Since Idaho implemented a strict abortion trigger ban in June 2022, 94 obstetricians have left the state due to legal confusion and restrictions on providing evidence-based reproductive healthcare. The upcoming Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act on the November ballot aims to restore patient autonomy and allow physicians in Idaho to deliver pregnancy-related care without fear of legal repercussions.

Idaho county clerks have 60 days to verify signatures for two ballot initiatives aiming to qualify for the 2026 general election: the Idaho Freedom and Privacy Act to end the state's abortion ban, and the Idaho Medical Cannabis Act to legalize medical marijuana for certain medical conditions. Supporters of both initiatives have expressed confidence in meeting signature requirements, with Idahoans United for Women and Families reporting over 106,000 signatures and the Natural Medicine Alliance of Idaho claiming more than 100,000 signatures collected statewide.

Idahoans United for Women and Families have met their signature goals in 19 legislative districts and submitted over 104,000 signatures to qualify the Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act for Idaho's November general election ballot. The initiative seeks to decriminalize abortion in Idaho and restore abortion rights up to fetal viability, reversing the state's current abortion ban triggered after the overturn of Roe v. Wade.

Idahoans United for Women and Families has gathered nearly 100,000 signatures to qualify a ballot initiative that would end Idaho's near-total abortion ban and add protections for reproductive rights in the November 2026 election. The initiative requires 70,725 valid signatures from registered Idaho voters and organizers expect to know if it qualifies by the end of June, with signature gathering supported by 1,100 volunteers across the state.